<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Systech Solutions LTD. &#187; hdmi built in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.systechsolutions.info/blog/tag/hdmi-built-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.systechsolutions.info/blog</link>
	<description>Making the most out of your technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Next HDMI to have Ethernet built in</title>
		<link>http://www.systechsolutions.info/blog/2009/05/next-hdmi-to-have-ethernet-built-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systechsolutions.info/blog/2009/05/next-hdmi-to-have-ethernet-built-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Document Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue tooth 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDMI 1.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdmi built in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nextgen HDMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless N]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systechsolutions.info/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ethernet built in?  Yeah I&#8217;m not impressed.  Ethernet is a pretty basic standard.  What&#8217;s the big deal?  Why is the next version of HDMI still using a physical cable?  The BlueTooth 2 spectrum supports enough bandwidth to stream 1080p video, so why are they just breaking us off another cable?  What about Wireless N?  What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethernet built in?  Yeah I&#8217;m not impressed.  Ethernet is a pretty basic standard.  What&#8217;s the big deal?  Why is the next version of HDMI still using a physical cable?  The BlueTooth 2 spectrum supports enough bandwidth to stream 1080p video, so why are they just breaking us off another cable?  What about Wireless N?  What about the 700mhz spectrum?</p>
<p>3rd parties have been developing wireless HDMI transceivers and receivers for over a year, why is the official HDMI next-gen still wired?  Who knows, but the original article is below:</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<p style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 20pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">Next HDMI to have Ethernet built in</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"> </p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">HDMI 1.4</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/lans/index.html">Network Architecture Alert</a> By <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/Home/jcaruso.html">Jeff Caruso</a> , Network World , 05/18/2009</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">Sign up for this newsletter now!</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">Site Editor Jeff Caruso helps you make sense of the evolving world of LANs and routers.</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"> </p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">Several Web sites last week came forward with details of the next version of the HDMI cable specification, one that will have Ethernet capabilities built in &#8211; but the group responsible for the spec isn&#8217;t verifying any of those details.</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"> </p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">High-Definition Multimedia Interface, or HDMI, is a spec primarily aimed at video and audio. If you have a high-definition TV, you may already be familiar with it as the interface that allows you to run a single cable between your cable-TV box and your TV, instead of a bunch of component audio and video lines.</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"> </p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"><a href="http://www.hdmi.org/">HDMI Licensing LLC</a> in January issued a press release saying that &#8220;high-speed data&#8221; via Ethernet would be consolidated into the next version of the cable, alongside HD video and audio.</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">HDMI is already being used for data in at least one corporate application, as I noted <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/lans/2009/030209lan1.html">a couple of months ago</a>. Netgear uses HDMI cables in its stackable Ethernet switches as the stacking connection that allows the switches to work together as one unit. Netgear says it can get a 10G bit/sec connection using the cables.</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"> </p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">Last week, several reports <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/hdmi-1-4-brings-internet-sharing-dreadful-tiers-of-quality/">surfaced</a> with more details than the January press release, saying that the next HDMI, version 1.4, would include an &#8220;HDMI Ethernet Channel&#8221; to deliver up to 100M bit/sec. Bloggers blasted the spec on the grounds that it is slated to have two different data rates, and that could be confusing to consumers. But like I said, the HDMI group isn&#8217;t confirming those details.</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;">Other features that the group did promise in January include better performance, a new connector for in-car audio and video, and a new smaller connector.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"> </p>
<p style="font-size: 8pt; margin: 0in; color: #666666; font-family: Tahoma;">Pasted from &lt;<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/lans/2009/051809lan1.html?nlhtarch=ts_051909&amp;nladname=051909networkarchitectureal">http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/lans/2009/051809lan1.html?nlhtarch=ts_051909&amp;nladname=051909networkarchitectureal</a>&gt;</p>
<p style="font-size: 11pt; margin: 0in; font-family: Calibri;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systechsolutions.info/blog/2009/05/next-hdmi-to-have-ethernet-built-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
